Additional notes on campaign statement by Alan Day:

"El Dorado Hills sewer bills that are 50%+ HIGHER on average than neighboring communities"


Summary comment:

The bar graph below compares Sacramento-area sewer rates.  EID wastewater rates are higher than those of service providers using secondary treatment, lower than those of most other service providers using tertiary treatment.

Those using only secondary treatment are permitted to do so because they have high dilution ratios for discharge into a river, especially the Sacramento River. However, regulatory action is in progress to require them to use tertiary treatment. This will roughly double their rates, probably making all of them more expensive than EID.

EID wastewater rates are relatively low among service providers already using tertiary treatment. Among these, the City of Placerville's rates are about 65% higher than EID, as are several Placer County service providers.

Regional rate comparison for wastewater service

Additional notes:

Most Sacramento County service providers use a single large treatment plant, operated by the Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD). It uses only secondary treatment, has a high dilution ratio in the Sacramento River, and probably benefits by economies of scale.

EID treatment in the far west end of El Dorado County uses two treatments plants. The El Dorado Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant has a capacity of 4.0 million gallons per day (MGD), is planned for eventual expansion to 5.3 MGD, and discharges into Carson Creek. The Deer Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant has a capacity of 3.6 MGD, which is expected to be its final buildout capacity. It discharges into Deer Creek. Both plants are required to use tertiary treatment in order to produce effluent with a purity level generally similar to that for drinking water.

The largest subsidy for EID rates is from sale of hydroelectric power generated by Project 184. In 2010 this produced just over $8 million.


Rate Increases

Earlier boards generally used relatively large sporadic rate increases. The current board is instead increasing rates more gradually.

EID rate increase history, 1987-2011

Rate increases should be expected as long as inflation exists and infrastructure ages enough to require replacement and upgrading. The Consumer Price Index probably is a fair guide to increasing labor cost per employee. Other inflation costs for equipment and materials may differ from the CPI for a specialized agency such as EID.

EID employment is now at its lowest level since 2001, 10 years ago.
Growth of excess employment occurred only with the term of service of a specific past General Manager.

Numer of employees and services

This graphic is a slightly edited rendition of a bar chart in the 2010 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.

Return to Review of Alan Day Campaign Statements      Return to Sierrafoot home page